-->
The affective context model has enabled me
to begin to understand the sounds that come out of people when they open their
mouths to speak.
Now you may have thought that at least some
of these sounds are things like: reasons, explanations, or argument. You may have assumed that people are basically rational creatures. And you
would be wrong.
This is because the basic form of human
spoken interaction is something like ‘song’.
What I mean is that our
vocalizations work in the following way: they reflect how we feel, and they
convey those feelings to others in the form of sound. In that sense they are very much like song – a
series of sounds that create an emotional resonance in creatures of a similar
kind.
Now of course I am sure you find this
preposterous – you cannot imagine that philosophical argument and political
debate can just be the sound of people expressing how they feel – but they are, and your emotional reaction nicely illustrates my point.
Over the centuries we have managed to
obscure what is really going on in our lives with a grand lie about reason and
rationality. But the truth was never very well hidden: Socrates discovered that
people couldn’t actually come up with good reasons for doing what they do (and they put
him to death), Kahnemann argued that our real reasons for doing things are almost entirely obscured (and they gave him a prize), but the point is essentially the
same: we feel our way through existence, singing an elaborate song that reflects those feelings, and pretending
that bits of it are rational - coming up with post-rationalisations.
That is not to say that rationality doesn’t
exist: just that it is a peculiar type of refrain – like a specific chord
series that people are attracted to.
Of course people don’t realise that this is
what they are doing, nor that this is how they work. Sometimes it only comes
into focus when you challenge them on something they feel, but have never had
to explain.
I was in a taxi once, in Texas, having a
perfectly friendly and reasonable conversation with a Houstonian when I made
the mistake of suggesting that maybe allowing everybody to own a gun was a bad
idea. I hit a bum note. The mood changed suddenly. There was a flurry of
irrational justifications, and then we moved on.
At some level I think you know this: that
people who feel that guns are great, or America is great, or God is great do not really feel that way
because they have been persuaded by the arguments – hence it is pointless to
argue otherwise. These are profound feelings which emerge in conversation – as
a particular type of song. For someone to sing a different song they would have
to come to feel quite differently. And sometimes they do.
So far you probably sympathize with me:
most of my readers ore not devout, or gun-owners, or American. So you like the sound of my
song.
You probably also think that democracy is
great. I don’t. I think democracy is a lot like guns – we give pretty much
anyone a vote regardless of their ability to wield it responsibly, with
terrible consequences. Democracy is not a good system in our modern age, it
leads to things like Trump and Brexit.
Notice the emotional reaction this causes
in you. Possibly no-one has ever challenged you to justify democracy before. A
flurry of incoherent rebuttals come to mind – perhaps the Churchill quote
‘democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others’ is on
the tip of your tongue. A little popular refrain to sing.
But my point here is not to persuade you
that there is a better system than democracy – we probably both know I couldn’t
do that anyway, no matter how rational my argument – because it’s something you
are deeply attached to. It is a song you have sung all your life.
Instead consider that these ideas: guns are
great, America is great, God is great, democracy is great are not really ideas
at all – they are feelings. Deeply felt ones, ones which illustrate a broader contention
- that all our ‘ideas’ are feelings. When we speak our ideas, we sing a song,
we share our feelings. I don't doubt that you can come up with 'reasons' - but neither do I doubt that these are just the complicated sounds that your feelings make as you express them.
Some feelings are so deeply held that we
will sing them however crazy or deleterious they are. They are like nursery
rhymes. Other times we will hear a song we like and sing along. We will have
experiences that change how we feel, and the songs that we sing.
In this way we can begin to see people for
what they are; at the very core of them are nursery rhymes – songs that lie at
their very heart. As adults, swirling in catchy songs – what the Greeks called
rhetoric – with rationality not so much in opposition, but a flavor of rhetoric
for those people who have fallen in love with the chords that make up the
rational tunes. Reason is just a pop song.
So this is a song that I expect no-one else
to sing today, but I hope everyone will sing one day.
No comments is great.
ReplyDelete