Consider palmistry.
There are techniques and books you can read. It is something
you might be paid to do – perhaps there are even conferences. The evidence
regarding its efficaciousness is doubtful but this doesn’t really matter - it is
popular nonetheless. It satisfies some ill-defined need.
It might be comforting for cheiromancers to have some evidence - and if we try I am sure we can rustle some up.
Imagine someone at a palmistry conference saying 'What we need is metrics!'. Might you think 'actually, that's exactly what we don't need!'
Imagine someone at a palmistry conference saying 'What we need is metrics!'. Might you think 'actually, that's exactly what we don't need!'
I use the word ‘bureaucracy’ to describe these kinds of things: worlds of
activities that spring up, with little connection to reality, but which provide
jobs and a sense of satisfaction.
Our world is awash with bureaucracies. One might even say
relies on them.
So when we ask, of a bureaucracy ‘does it work?’ it depends
what question one is trying to answer.
‘Palmistry – does it work?’
No comments:
Post a Comment